{"id":9400,"date":"2026-08-18T12:22:52","date_gmt":"2026-08-18T12:22:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/?p=9400"},"modified":"2026-08-18T12:22:54","modified_gmt":"2026-08-18T12:22:54","slug":"same-law-degree-different-advantage-rajasthan-hc-questions-bsnls-nlu-preference-allows-3-year-ll-b-graduate-to-join-recruitment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/same-law-degree-different-advantage-rajasthan-hc-questions-bsnls-nlu-preference-allows-3-year-ll-b-graduate-to-join-recruitment\/","title":{"rendered":"Same Law Degree, Different Advantage? Rajasthan HC Questions BSNL\u2019s NLU Preference, Allows 3-Year LL.B. Graduate to Join Recruitment"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Jaipur: <\/strong>The Rajasthan High Court has issued notice to Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) over a challenge to its recruitment criteria for Legal Consultants, which gives preference to candidates with a 5-year integrated LL.B. from National Law Universities (NLUs) and candidates with good PG CLAT scores.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The petition, filed by Anmol Devanda, a 3-year LL.B. graduate, challenges BSNL\u2019s advertisement dated July 7, 2026, arguing that the preference puts candidates with 3-year LL.B. degrees from other Bar Council of India (BCI)-recognised institutions at a disadvantage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The matter was argued by Dr. Prakhar Agrawal and Anjali Assat on behalf of the petitioner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The petitioner argued that BSNL\u2019s mandatory eligibility criteria treats 3-year and 5-year LL.B. degrees equally, requiring an LL.B. from a BCI-recognised institution, at least 60% marks and three years of post-qualification experience. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the petitioner, once both degrees are accepted as essential qualifications, candidates with a 5-year degree cannot be given additional preference merely because of the course duration or the institution from which they graduated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Counsel submitted that the distinction between NLU graduates and other BCI-recognised law graduates lacks a rational basis and violates the constitutional guarantee of equality under Articles 14 and 16. The petition also refers to Article 19.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The petitioner further pointed out that BSNL has not prescribed a similar preference for the post of Real Estate Legal Consultant, where both 3-year and 5-year LL.B. degrees are accepted without such an advantage. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">He also questioned the use of PG CLAT scores, arguing that an academic entrance examination cannot be treated as a decisive measure of professional competence for an experienced Legal Consultant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The petitioner also contended that several BCI-recognised institutions offer both 3-year and 5-year law programmes and that graduates from these institutions possess recognised professional legal qualifications. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Therefore, giving preference solely to NLU graduates, according to the plea, does not satisfy the test of reasonable or rational classification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Justice Sameer Jain, after hearing the submissions, issued notice to BSNL and directed it to file its response within three weeks. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court also granted interim relief to the petitioner by permitting him to participate provisionally in the ongoing selection process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court has not yet decided the validity of BSNL\u2019s recruitment criteria. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The legality of the disputed preference, including the NLU and PG CLAT-based \u201cDesirable Criteria\u201d, will be considered after BSNL submits its response.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court has issued notice to Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) over a challenge to its recruitment criteria for Legal Consultants, which gives preference to candidates with a 5-year integrated LL.B. from National Law Universities (NLUs) and candidates with good PG CLAT scores. The petition, filed by Anmol Devanda, a 3-year LL.B. &#8230; <a title=\"Same Law Degree, Different Advantage? Rajasthan HC Questions BSNL\u2019s NLU Preference, Allows 3-Year LL.B. Graduate to Join Recruitment\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/same-law-degree-different-advantage-rajasthan-hc-questions-bsnls-nlu-preference-allows-3-year-ll-b-graduate-to-join-recruitment\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Same Law Degree, Different Advantage? Rajasthan HC Questions BSNL\u2019s NLU Preference, Allows 3-Year LL.B. Graduate to Join Recruitment\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8853,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_wppp_is_locked":false,"_wppp_selected_plans":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,69],"tags":[2133,2132,2142,609,2141,2139,2136,2134,2143,2138,2144,2137,308,2140,2135,659,43,2145],"class_list":["post-9400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-top-stories","category-rajasthan-high-court","tag-3-year-ll-b","tag-5-year-ll-b","tag-anmol-devanda","tag-article-19","tag-articles-14-and-16","tag-bci-recognised-institutions","tag-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited","tag-bsnl","tag-equality","tag-legal-consultant-recruitment","tag-legal-consultants","tag-legal-recruitment","tag-national-law-universities","tag-nlu-preference","tag-pg-clat","tag-rajasthan-hc","tag-rajasthan-high-court","tag-recruitment-criteria"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9400"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9400\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9401,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9400\/revisions\/9401"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}