{"id":9634,"date":"2026-09-09T05:57:07","date_gmt":"2026-09-09T05:57:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/?p=9634"},"modified":"2026-09-09T05:57:08","modified_gmt":"2026-09-09T05:57:08","slug":"rsrtc-cannot-terminate-contractual-employees-for-misconduct-without-giving-them-a-hearing-says-rajasthan-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/rsrtc-cannot-terminate-contractual-employees-for-misconduct-without-giving-them-a-hearing-says-rajasthan-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"RSRTC Cannot Terminate Contractual Employees for Misconduct Without Giving Them a Hearing, says Rajasthan HC"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Jaipur:<\/strong> The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed a batch of appeals filed by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC), upholding the reinstatement of contractual Driver-cum-Conductors whose services were terminated on allegations of misconduct without giving them an opportunity of hearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A Division Bench of Justice Arun Monga and Justice Ashutosh Kumar held that although a contractual or temporary employee does not enjoy the same service protection as a regular government employee, a termination based on misconduct cannot be made without following the principles of natural justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Contractual Status Does Not Override Natural Justice<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court drew a distinction between a simple termination under the terms of a contract and a termination founded on allegations of misconduct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Court held that where a contractual employee is simply discontinued in accordance with the contract or on expiry of the engagement, no disciplinary enquiry is ordinarily required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, once misconduct becomes the basis of termination, the action becomes punitive and the employee must be informed of the allegations and given an opportunity to be heard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case arose after RSRTC terminated the services of Manoj Kumar and other contractual Driver-cum-Conductors on February 21, 2008, citing alleged violations of their contractual conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Manoj Kumar challenged the termination before the Rajasthan High Court, contending that he had been removed without being given an opportunity to explain the allegations against him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Single Judge subsequently quashed the termination orders and directed reinstatement with continuity of service, while denying back wages and allowing RSRTC to take a fresh decision after conducting a disciplinary enquiry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">RSRTC then challenged the Single Judge\u2019s order before the Division Bench.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">HC Relies on Earlier Ramraj Gurjar Judgment<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The High Court further observed that the case was squarely covered by its earlier Division Bench judgment in Ramraj Gurjar v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Since the same class of employees, nature of engagement and manner of discontinuance were involved, the Court found no basis to interfere with the Single Judge&#8217;s order applying the earlier precedent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Bench noted that the relief granted by the Single Judge was limited. The employees were granted reinstatement with continuity of service, but back wages were denied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\">RSRTC Appeals Dismissed<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Division Bench ultimately dismissed the special appeals and directed compliance with the Single Judge&#8217;s order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed a batch of appeals filed by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC), upholding the reinstatement of contractual Driver-cum-Conductors whose services were terminated on allegations of misconduct without giving them an opportunity of hearing. A Division Bench of Justice Arun Monga and Justice Ashutosh Kumar held that although &#8230; <a title=\"RSRTC Cannot Terminate Contractual Employees for Misconduct Without Giving Them a Hearing, says Rajasthan HC\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/rsrtc-cannot-terminate-contractual-employees-for-misconduct-without-giving-them-a-hearing-says-rajasthan-hc\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about RSRTC Cannot Terminate Contractual Employees for Misconduct Without Giving Them a Hearing, says Rajasthan HC\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":9195,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_wppp_is_locked":false,"_wppp_selected_plans":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,69],"tags":[2841,2840,2832,2835,2479,2837,1254,433,48,2836,2575,89,2838,659,43,150,2834,2839,2833,86,2829,2325],"class_list":["post-9634","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-top-stories","category-rajasthan-high-court","tag-back-wages","tag-continuity-of-service","tag-contractual-employees","tag-contractual-employees-rights","tag-disciplinary-enquiry","tag-driver-cum-conductors","tag-justice-arun-monga","tag-justice-ashutosh-kumar","tag-legal-news","tag-manoj-kumar","tag-misconduct","tag-natural-justice","tag-principles-of-natural-justice","tag-rajasthan-hc","tag-rajasthan-high-court","tag-rajasthan-legal-news","tag-rajasthan-state-road-transport-corporation","tag-ramraj-gurjar-case","tag-reinstatement","tag-service-law","tag-special-appeals","tag-termination"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9634","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9634"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9634\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9635,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9634\/revisions\/9635"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9195"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9634"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9634"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawsandlegals.com\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9634"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}